Home Family Court

Family Court

Family Law Overview

Family Law Overview

 

Family Court is a type of court that deals with all familial matters, including child support, visitation rights, custodianship, as well as other matters that involve a familial unit as a whole; matters that involve solely parental issues are handled in other types of court, like divorce and alimony.

 

With the advent of family court, familial units undergoing matters that are emotionally charged in nature, matters where subjectivity and bias might potentially cloud the respective decision making skills of a family member  are provided with a theoretically and legally objective, neutral forum in which these matters can be discussed in a rational and productive fashion.

 

For example, subsequent to a divorce, each individual parent involved might feel that the other was responsible for the termination of the marriage, and furthermore, they may feel as though they deserve sole custody , legal, physical, or both, over the child produced from the marriage. In this event, which usually manifests into a hostile environment, a lack of amicable, respectful discourse is not normally possible, and heightened tempers create stumbling blocks in front of a sound decision.

 

Upon traversing into the realm of family court, each individual parent is allowed a myriad of options in which to pursue the settlement in question. Should the parents feel as though they can maintain amicable relations, they are offered an opportunity to enter into mediation in lieu of an actual hearing. However, if mediation is not possible, then each individual is given the opportunity to hire their own attorney in order to plead their case in front of a judge in a productive and unemotional manner.

 

Due to the fact that matters in the home possess such emotional and ardent implications, a forum like family court that promotes stoicism and logic in order to provide optimal care for all parties involved is sometimes a necessity.

 

Marriage

 

Civil Rights movement in the United States, both racial, as well as gender roles have become modernized and modified in their representational and legal value. Archaic marriage law is considered to be sexist and misogynistic, rife with discrimination and alienation due to the characteristics and legal descriptions assigned by an archaic female gender role.

 

Yet, due to gains made in the Civil Rights movement, minorities, a term to which include any individuals who are not Caucasian and male, to varying degrees  are afforded equal rights in all forums of legislation. As a result, upon the decision to get married, a couple must establish legal ground rules and stipulations in order to provide for not only a happy and healthy marriage, but also for any contingencies that might arise in the event of its dissolution.

 

Terms like alimony and prenuptial agreement have become commonplace in the inception of many marriages. Many might argue that legal documents might detract from a perceived purity of marriage, yet the argument can made that every individual has the right to make certain that they are protected, along with their respective assets, in the event of a tragedy or trauma.

 

Prior to the establishment of equal rights for all American citizens in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, many aspects and instances that took place in this country were viewed through a patricentric lens, forcing women entering a marriage to be susceptible to the whim of the husband.

 

Divorce

 

court hearing in which individuals may be invested personally, individuals engaging in divorce hearings are more often than not emotionally invested, allowing for subjectivity, bias, and personal sentiment to enter,  invariably skewing logic and rationale.

 

Despite any overarching emotional feelings, personal vendettas, or statements of passion, a court hearing aims to provide a stoic, neutral forum in which the full extent of rights are to be granted to any individual that participates in a court hearing.

 

However, as with any situation that retains such emotional volatility, it is important to quell any hostile and unproductive sentiment from tainting the impartiality of a court hearing.

 

In order to do so, the individuals involved are urged to choose an attorney of their liking to represent them; the ideal attorney is empathic and understanding to the needs of their client, knowledgeable and learned in all legal matters of which their area of expertise is comprised, and determined, and dedicated, to have the best interest of their respective client in mind at all times.

 

By hiring representation, sentiments and opinions can be expressed devoid of subjective and emotional bias. The return of property and assets need be considered priority, if not the rights of a citizen. In addition, if that marriage has produced a child, considerations must be made for the well-being of the child in question.

 

Children

 

The best interest of children, or minors, is the prime concern. Due to their respective younger ages, a factor that brings with it an innate not-fully-developed sense of understanding, perception, and overarching maturity, their welfare and well-being must be a priority in an process in which they are directly involved.

 

Children cannot and should not be held to the same emotional standards of their adult counterparts; they need to be afforded leniency, compassion, and understanding. Furthermore, in a majority of legal situations in which children are involved, be it divorce or adoption, their role is that of circumstance; they neither chose nor caused the events of any given situation.

 

In the event that two parents wish to terminate their marriage, the collective stance that they must take is one that focuses on the best interest of their child or children.

 

Oftentimes, children will blame themselves for their parents’ divorce by means of internalization and obsession. The respective parents need to be cognizant of potential sensitivity and affectation on the part of their child, and behave accordingly; hostile relationships and emotional tumult are simply unproductive in the assistance of a child maintaining a semblance of normalcy.

 

As a result, different custodial options have been instituted that provide sole or joint custody to one or both of the parents, ideally allowing the child an emotionally-healthy life in which they may maintain a productive and wholesome relationship with their respective parents, or in the case of prior abuse, a removal of the presence of a parent who may be a cause of further abuse, trauma, or pain on behalf of the child in question.

 

In the event of adoption, gubernatorial agencies and organizations have taken great precautions with the hopes of providing a mutually beneficial situation for both adoptive parents and the children whom they have chosen to adopt.

 

A lengthy and severe screening process has been establish in order to ascertain that the new adoptive family are comprised of generous and stable individuals who will be able to provide a loving and emotionally-prosperous environment for the child in question.

 

Adoption

 

Adoption is one that is inherently mutually beneficial in nature; it allows for both parents, as well as children who are longing to be united in hopes of the creation of an ad hoc familial unit. On one hand, parents who suffer from infertility are relieved of their respective stress and despair by being granted the opportunity to raise a child, despite their biological circumstances.

 

On the other hand, a child born into impoverishment or an abusive situation is allowed the opportunity to enjoy a healthy, accommodating, and meaningful home life that can provide a groundwork for a successful future. In these terms, adoption is a truly a gift to both parties. Yet, as in any legal process, complications exist.

 

Although many of the families or single parents wishing to adopt have the most benevolent and pure intentions, there exist others who do not share in those beliefs. In some cases, abused children have simply been adopted into other abusive environments, proving to be devastating for the mental and emotional state of the child in question.

 

As a result, an intense screening and qualification has been established by child-advocate welfare agencies in order to solidify that the adoptive parents are of virtuous and decent moral fiber. Furthermore, a system of check-ups and follow-ups have been instated, ensuring that the child in question continues to receive the humane, loving treatment to which they are entitled.

 

Yet, certain LGBT couples and individuals, regardless of their inherent benevolence and kind hearted nature, have been brought into question as far as their ability to raise a child in a healthy environment – thus, adding to further complications in the adoption process.

 

Furthermore, the respective ethnicity and race of both children, as well as adoptive parents has been brought into question. The process of adoption is a complex one, and as a result, a majority of people question the penalization of LGBT and interracial adoption as a crime against both the parents, as well as the children themselves.

Family Law Firms Quick Overview

Family Law Firms Quick Overview

Family courts handle cases that relate to familial or domestic relationships. In many cases, it is advantageous for individuals to seek legal representation from a family law firm when facing family law proceedings. Family law firms can offer specialized services depending on the type of case that a client is involved in.

 

For example, some family law firms specialize in divorce. In addition, there are family law firms that specialize in dealing with cases regarding juvenile delinquency. In essence, family law firms offer service that is specialized to address different types of family law cases.

 

In addition, each family law firm is likely to have attorneys with different specializations in the event that the clients case is complex and requires several types of specialized knowledge. For example, a client may require one attorney that specializes in divorce and one that specializes in domestic abuse cases.

 

An example of a case that will be heard in family court, is divorce. In that case, the couple may have taken part in prenuptial agreements or post nuptial agreements. Many times, individuals can retain the services of the family law firm that represented them when the agreement was written. This can be helpful because of the firm's familiarity with the agreement that was specific to that individual's relationship, and be familiar with the couple themselves.

 

It is also a benefit when an individual is familiar with their attorney, because of the resulting comfort level. Divorces can be quite difficult and it is vital that individuals can place trust and faith in their family law firm, and any attorneys that are a part of that firm.  Family law firms can also be helpful in adoptions and cases that involve foster child placement. In some cases, states have very ambiguous laws in regards to adoption, especially in cases that involve surrogacy. 

 

However, individuals can be assured that their law firm has dealt with similar cases, and is experienced in dealing with the intricacies of the laws that apply. In fact, individuals should be sure to hire a law firm that has worked with cases that are very similar to their own. In addition, individuals should check the success rate of family law firms.

 

In some cases, they may find that their firm has not experienced great success and in others, they may find that the firm has never lost a case. In many cases, the fees associated with hiring a firm, are somewhat dependent on the firm's ability to produce successful outcomes for their clients. However, family law cases are often too important to leave in the hands of a firm that is inexperienced in the particulars of the case.

 

Family law firms are generally experienced in all aspects of family law. However, clients should be sure that the firm has had success in cases similar to their own. While no two cases are completely alike, there are often general similarities, especially in family law. Clients should be sure that they are comfortable with their attorneys and they have constant access to them in case there are any impending questions or issues.

General Jurisdiction Explained

General Jurisdiction Explained

Family courts hear cases involving families or people in domestic situations, such as dating or domestic partnerships. The major issues that are dealt with in family court are issues that relate to children such as adoption, child support, and child custody.
In fact, custody modifications requests or child support modification cases are also heard in family court. Information on how best to follow those court orders is also provided for parents through the courts.
In addition, almost all matters that pertain to divorce are heard in family court. Advice from the judge often includes an attempt at resolution through mediation. In any case, family courts seek resolutions that benefit the family unit, especially the children.
Issues that relate to children are generally heard in family court. Information regarding re-offense and the consequences facing a juvenile delinquent will often be provided to the guardian of the child before they leave family court.
Advice from the judge usually includes psychological counseling which is sometimes mandated by family court. Information is also given to the child so that they can learn how to avoid future legal trouble. In general, juvenile delinquency is not punishable in an extreme fashion until the child re-offends.
In fact, judges usually try to bring the family to a mutual understanding on the best course of action for the child while they are still in family court. Advice is offered based on the best course of action for both child and the family. In fact, families are generally responsible for the juvenile offender when they are released.
The child is usually released into the custody of at least one guardian and the guardian is sometimes held responsible for the actions of the child. In fact, guardians can be punished by the courts if the child is not compliant with the orders of the court.
Many of these issues are discussed before the family leaves family court. Information if provided on counseling services, rehabilitation programs, and schools that are adept at dealing with children that experience difficulties. In addition, other issues that relate to family, such as divorce are heard in family court.
Advice is given to the couple on ways that they can try to come to a resolution without court interference. In fact, courts often require that couples seek the services of a mediator before the court will hear their case.
Many issues that relate to familial or domestic relationships are handled in family court. Advice is often provided to families to help them deal with issues related to whatever has brought them to family court. Information is provided in addition to the courts ruling on the case.
As a matter of fact, judges will provide information to both parents on what will happen if either parent is found to be in non compliance with a court order. By doing so, the courts try to avoid issues of non compliance, thereby keeping the courts free to deal with new cases as they arise.

General Court System and Role of Family Court

General Court System and Role of Family Court

Family law courts vary in each state. In fact, family law courts are subjected to different regulations and go by different names in different states. In addition, family law cases may be handled by different divisions within a state's judicial system.

Every state has specific courts meant to determine cases based in family law. Information is generally available from the state's court system or website, so that individuals can try to anticipate where their case will be heard. The information will also outline each individual's options on how to file for their case to be heard, or how to respond to another person's case.

Each state is allowed certain liberties when determining where family law cases are heard. Some states offer specific family law courts that hear all cases that relate to family law, while others break it down even further. In Pennsylvania, the family division is one of three divisions in the Court of Common Pleas.

Within the family division is the juvenile court and the domestic relations court. In contrast, New Jersey allows family law cases to be heard in the family division of the states Superior Court. In fact, juvenile delinquency cases are heard in the same court as divorce cases.

In New Jersey, the Superior Court has judicial authority over all cases that relate to family law. Courts are able to issue decisions on all aspects that relate to divorce, including child custody and spousal support. In addition, individuals may wish to seek mediation as an alternative to court proceedings on issues of family law.

Information is provided by the judicial system that will outline options on how each case can be handled. Many times, family courts allow mediation as an option. While many states offer mediation as an option, each state will still require that individuals file their case with the courts.

In Missouri, family law cases are handled by the circuit court and must be filed accordingly. In general, states have separate divisions that deal with cases regarding family law. Information can generally be found on each states official website. If for instance, an individual wished to file for custody and obtain an order of protection, they may have to file paperwork with two separate divisions of their state's family court.

There are many types of court cases that are determined using family law. Information regarding court divisions within family law courts can be helpful to individuals that are representing themselves in cases that involve family law. Information can also be provided by attorneys should individuals obtain legal representation. It is important that any individual understand the way that their state handles family law cases. Individuals will be more comfortable with court proceedings if they are aware of the process and knowledgeable about possible outcomes. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact family lawyers.

Is Family Court a Federal Court?

Is Family Court a Federal Court?

Although there are a multitude of family laws that are largely specific to family courts, such as divorce, domestic violence, marriage, child support, and custody, issues involving family law and familial stipulations have been heard in Federal Court.

In many cases, family courts are specific to the states in which they are located, and as a result, are under the jurisdiction of that state‚Äôs legislature in lieu of an overarching federal legislature. Family law cases involving two individuals are normally heard in family court; not in federal court. 

However, in the event of an issue surrounding family law in which the government has been involved can be heard in federal court. In addition, a family law issue in which a verdict is unable to be reached can be moved to federal court. An example of a family law that was heard in federal court was the case of Roe v Wade in 1973, which addressed the legality of aborting a pregnancy.

All About Family Court

All About Family Court

Family courts are a division of each state’s superior courts. Family courts deal only with certain issues that relate to family matters. For example, some of the issue that family court may hear are divorce cases, domestic and child abuse cases, custody cases and adoption cases.
Family courts were set up to help determine outcomes for any cases that relate to the institution of family. They were created to resolve family issues in a fair manner, one in which the rights of each family member are held to be important.
In fact, a family court is suppose to promote family as an institution. Since family courts have only one focus, to promote the interests of the family, they are able to devote full time and attention to these very specific types of court cases.
A family court will deal with cases that relate to abuse and neglect allegations, of both children and spouses. By having a specific focus, family courts can address the seriousness of the allegations while also striving to maintain the family as an institution. In fact, in cases of abuse, judges set out to protect all family members from the abuser, in order to promote the family’s well being.
For example, in the case of spousal abuse, the judge is not likely to allow the children contact with the abuser. In fact, family courts resulted from the frequency of such cases, and inability of the regular courts to deal with cases in a timely and efficient manner.
In the past, courts were so backlogged that individuals who suffered from abuse were left waiting for orders of protection, which often put victims lives in jeopardy. In addition, family courts can deal with several issues at once. In a divorce, a judge can deal with property distribution, support payments and custody issues.
While the issues may not all be heard at the same time, they are likely to be assigned to the same judge. As a result, families can be assured that the judge is familiar with their case and can make decision based on the health and well being of the family unit as a whole.
Families are also spared the necessity of repeating their entire family history every time they need to go to court to handle another related issue. Also, judges in family court become experts in making the best decision on family matters, because they are focused on such issues exclusively. In the past, courts had to handle a myriad of issues, and could not possibly be familiar with the intricacies of family law.
Family courts strive to handle all issues in a way that best contributes to the overall interests of the family. In fact, family courts strive to find timely and fair resolutions to all family matters. In addition, courts may mandate that the family tries to resolve their issues through mediation.
This can be helpful for families because the become able to resolve issues in an effective manner, without the need for constant court intervention. In addition to saving money, these families are also able to learn conflict resolution which often results in a stronger and closer family.

Simple Overview to Family Court

Simple Overview to Family Court

Each state has its own manner of dealing with family law cases. Some states have provided specific family courts, while others have decided to have all family law cases heard in other divisions, such as a circuit court.
Family courts are utilized for any cases that relate to relationships between family or domestic relationships, such as a couple that is dating. It can be beneficial to have a court that deals only with cases that are related to familial relations.
For example, family courts have freed up other areas of the judicial system. However, many people are opposed to family courts for various reasons. Many people claim that family courts promote discord among family members and often drag out legal battles. However, the basic premise of creating family courts was to promote stability among family units.
In contrast, many people claim that family courts make decisions based on bias. In fact, statistics show that women are far more likely to retain custody of children, even when fathers are just as adept at raising the children. In fact many people argue that in cases where both parents are equal, the parent that is more fiscally secure should receive custody rights.
However, the courts claim to make all decisions based in the best interests of the child and many courts believe that mothers should retain custody in those cases. Many people also claim that families are forced to spend huge amounts of money in order to have a case heard in family courts. In fact, a more wealthy individual generally receives better results in family court cases because they can afford to retain the services of a family law attorney.
Family law attorneys are very knowledgeable as to the intricacies involved in family law, and generally achieve far better result than individuals that represent themselves. In fact, individuals that acquire the services of a family law firm fair even better, because firms employ lawyers with varying specialities within family law. However, individuals that must represent themselves, can also experience positive results from their family law case.
As long as individuals educate themselves about all applicable laws, forms and possible outcomes, they will be more confident in court. That confidence and knowledge can result in positive outcomes. Due to the differing ability of individuals to retain legal services, some courts find that it is advantageous for couples to attempt an agreement through family court mediation.
In mediation, couples seek to reach agreements and therefore, the courts are only burdened with decisions on factor in which the couples could not come to an agreement. This saves the courts time and the couple money. Another option for individuals facing family court is collaborative family law. In that case, couples strive to come to a mutually beneficial agreement in the absence of court intervention. These agreements simply require court approval once it has been reached.
Types of Cases Tried and Role of Court
There are several types of cases heard in family court. In some instances, these cases overlap. Due to that overlap, families often have their cases heard by the same judge, or group of judges. In fact, cases that are heard by the same judge, often result in quicker decisions and less stress for all involved parties. When judges are familiar with a family, cases run more smoothly and family members are not forced to repeat the background facts of the case.
For example, divorces are heard in family court. Divorce cases often relate to many other issues for the court. In addition to granting the divorce, judges may have to rule on several other issues that result from that ruling.
For instance, a couple that has children will need the courts decision on issues that pertain to child support and child custody. In fact, those are two separate issues for the court to decide. In addition, the courts may issue a temporary ruling on those issues, until a permanent ruling can be issued. In addition, some divorces involve domestic abuse or child abuse.
The court will certainly make determinations on those issues, probably before they hear any cases related to child support or custody. The judge is not likely to grant custody, or even unsupervised visitation to a parent that has been found to be abusive.
In addition, the courts have the power to grant legal name changes to spouses, and even to children. The name changes may be granted so that victims can escape the abuser. However, name changes may also be granted simply because a woman prefers to go back to her maiden name. In contrast, the courts also hear cases that relate to existing marriages.
For example, parents may have disagreements relating to issues that relate to the upbringing of children. Family courts also hear cases on adoption. In some marriages, a step parent may want to legally adopt their spouse’s children.
The family courts would make that determination, based on the wishes of surviving parents, and the best interests of the children. Family courts also make decisions on foster care placements and juvenile delinquency. In fact, family courts hear an endless list of types of cases that relate to familial and domestic relationships.
Court Resources

The courts offer many resources to any individual that is involved in family law cases. First, the courts will provide any forms that pertain to the case.
In addition, the courts will provide detailed directions that explain how the forms must be filled out and where they should be filed. In addition, the courts will help serve all involved parties with any legal summons. Family courts will also provide individuals with resources such as family law centers.
Those centers employ specialists that help families come to a mutual agreement in the absence of court intervention. This type of mediation helps families to avoid the stress, expense and time involved in court proceedings. In fact, cases handled by family law centers generally reach agreements much sooner than those handled in court. The courts will also provide information for individuals that cannot afford to retain the services of a family law attorney.
In fact, they generally provide lists of resources for individuals or families that qualify for free legal advice or pro bono legal representation. However, some individuals find that they still have to represent themselves in court. There are many resources available to those individuals. In addition to free legal advice from state agencies or organizations in the non profit sector, individuals can utilize the services in law libraries.
Generally, law libraries can provide the most up to date information on family law, and can also provide examples of case law that may apply to the individuals specific case. In fact, law libraries often grant access to all legal forums and fee based websites. Employees will help individuals to sort through the myriad of information available.

What Are The Family Court Benefits

What Are The Family Court Benefits

In the past, states did not have specific family courts which focused on issues that related to the institution of family. However, the need for family court became clear as other courts began to become backlogged with family law cases. In addition, increasing occurrence of family issues such as divorce and associated issues have also made the need of family courts obvious.
There are many people that support the idea of family courts and the benefits associated with a special judicial divisions whose aim is to provide decisions in the best interest of family institution. In fact, courts are able to focus all of their attention on issues that relate to family and domestic problems.
In the past, courts were too generalized and were unable to focus on specific issues. In fact, family court judges now deal only with family issues. In addition, families are usually assigned to the same judge for all of their cases and this allows the judge to have a greater understanding of each particular family unit.
There are many benefits of a separate family court within each states judicial system. For example, some families are unable to resolve disputes on their own. In some cases, the family court will assign a family a mediator that will try to resolve family issues without court intervention.
The benefits of mediation include better conflict resolution skills, which often brings family members closer together. In addition, family members tend to be calmer and think more clearly when they are in the presence of a mediator or judge. By utilizing family mediation, families also free the courts’ time so that they can deal with serious cases in a timely and efficient manner. However, many family law cases end up being heard by a judge.
The advantage of having a judge decide family law cases is that they should rule without prejudice. In the past, cases were often decided on factors that may have included gender or financial bias. However, judges in family court, are better trained to issues decisions based on the best interest of family members, especially the children.
On the same token, juvenile offenders should be treated differently than adults, and family courts provide punishment while trying to rehabilitate the child before they become an adult offender.
Since family law cases began being heard in specialized family courts, family issues have been resolved in a more timely, fair, and efficient manner. In fact, families’ wait times for decisions on family law cases has been significantly decreased in most cases. While divorce rates continue to increase, many family courts send divorcing couples into mediation as a first step.
In fact, family mediation is one of the greatest benefits offered through the family courts. However, some cases are not settled through mediation and families must go before a judge. Family law cases are often decided by judges that have had extensive experiences in cases that relate to familial or domestic issues.

Collaborative Law in Family Court Explained

Collaborative Law in Family Court Explained

Many cases that are generally heard in family courts, are complex and involve many issues. In fact, issues such as divorce, require decisions on many different matters. In fact, couples going through divorce, may find that they spend a significant amount of time in court, allowing the judge to make all determinations.

However, some couples choose to have their case handled by collaborative family law, are often required to sign a document that they will not take their case to court. The goal of family law services to handle their divorce. When couples have these agreements in place, most questions are answered within the clauses of the agreement. For example, the couple has already made determinations about distribution of property and assets.

Because of the agreements, the couple does not really require court proceedings to make final determinations, unless one individual believes that the agreement is unfair and should be overturned. However, even in that case, couples can attempt a resolution through collaborative family law services, but many states require a judges final approval on issues that relate to child support, child custody and visitation. In fact, some states will only allow a judge to make those determinations.

Divorce can be very complicated but family law services can be utilized in family law issues such as juvenile delinquency. In this case, state services will work with attorneys to work out both a punishment and rehabilitation plan for the offender and their family. In fact, every effort is made to prevent the juvenile from re-offending. In some states, the courts system makes great efforts to avoid having a juvenile go through court proceedings that relate to minor offenses.

family law services. In fact, involved parties are more likely to be accepting of any determination that they had a say in. Collaborative family law combines the efforts of all involved parties to achieve an outcome that is beneficial to all. In addition, involved parties are able to avoid lengthy and expensive court proceedings.

Understanding The Criticisms To Family Court

Understanding The Criticisms To Family Court

There are many people that criticize family courts. Many people believe that family court laws are gender biased. As an example, many issues of custody are decided in favor of the mother, regardless of the many other issues involved.
It appears that most courts still believe that children should be raised by their mother regardless of other factors that are usually involved in divorce cases, such as parental availability to the child.
For example, a mother may work many hours, but is still awarded full custody of the child. In addition, many critics argue against juvenile offenders receiving special treatments when they commit serious crimes. There are many criticisms of family courts, and many of them have some basis in fact.
Many people argue that family court laws are full of gender biased decisions. For example, family law courts are accused of deciding issues of custody, child support and alimony in favor of females, even if the facts of the case do not support the finding. Statistics show that women often fair much better than men during a divorce.
In addition, many people argue that woman’s quality of life improves after a divorce, because she is often awarded payments above the  standard of living she enjoyed while married. In addition, many people complain that many families are unable to afford attorneys and are often forced to represent themselves when confronted with issues that pertain to family court.
Laws can be confusing and individuals that represent themselves can suffer from huge financial consequences in addition to the loss of custody. In many cases, if only one person is able to avoid a lawyer the outcome of the case can be changed significantly. In fact, individuals that retain the services of a lawyer, often fare much better than individuals forced to represent themselves.
In fact, family court laws often prohibit low income individuals from receiving free or low cost representation, even when faced with such important issues such as loss of custody.
Many families have questioned why criminals can get free lawyers, but people faced with losing their families are unable to do so. Also, families complain that family law courts promote conflict by deciding cases based on family court law, as opposed to the facts presented in specific cases.
In fact, family law courts can often be filled with family members already in conflict, and the courts have been accused of furthering that conflict. In addition, in family court, laws sometimes take precedence over providing for the best interests of family members.
Family law courts have been accused of dismissing decisions that would have been in the best interest of the family members involved in the case. In fact, family law courts must adhere to strict rules and regulations that do not always allow for judges to take extenuating circumstances under consideration.
In addition juvenile offenders that commit serious crimes often receive much less severe punishments than adults who commit the same crime, even if there is only one year age difference.
In fact,much of the criticism focused on family courts is their ability to treat offenders differently than other courts.

Arizona Family Law

Tennessee Family Law

Indiana Family Law

Colorado Family Law

Minnesota Family Law

Wisconsin Family Law

Maryland Family Law